Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 6;66(11):3189–3199. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv128

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Silencing of PUB17 in N. benthamiana or tobacco compromises Cf4/Avr4 cell death but not INF1 cell death. (A) Graph shows the percentage HR elicited by INF1 or Cf4/Avr4 on N. benthamiana plants silenced for NbPUB17 using the TRV-ARM and NC constructs, respectively. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA with pairwise comparisons performed with a Holm–Sidak test; **P ≤0.01 (n=11), error bars show standard error. (B) Representative leaves silenced for NbPUB17 and TRV-GFP showing INF1 HR on the left side of the leaf and Cf4/Avr4 HR on the right. (C) Graph shows the percentage HR elicited by INF1 or Cf4/Avr4 on N. tabacum plants silenced for NtPUB17 (lines 242H, E, and J) are shown beside the non-silenced control Cf9. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA with pairwise comparisons performed with a Holm–Sidak test; **P ≤0.01, ***P ≤0.001 (n=22), error bars show standard error. (D) Representative leaves silenced for NtPUB17 and the control showing INF1 HR on the left side of the leaf and Cf4/Avr4 HR on the right.