Table 2.

Comparison of estimated ICP from the SR, Kashif method and the PI method for resting state and VM state (mean ± standard deviation, mmHg)

	SR method		Kashif method		PI method
	Resting state	VM state	Resting state	VM state	Resting state	VM state
Subject 1	10.1 ± 1.1	14.7 ± 0.6*	21.6 ± 4.2	24.5 ± 4.1*	10.1 ± 0.3	9.8 ± 0.5
Subject 2	9.1 ± 1.1	11.8 ± 0.8*	11.3 ± 5.4	13.7 ± 5.0	9.5 ± 0.4	9.5 ± 0.7
Subject 3	14.1 ± 0.8	15.3 ± 0.8*	29.6 ± 4.9	31.2 ± 5.0	9.4 ± 0.4	8.4 ± 0.5
Subject 4	13.5 ± 0.8	14.7 ± 0.8*	23.5 ± 5.1	25.1 ± 5.4	8.2 ± 0.3	7.8 ± 0.4
Subject 5	10.6 ± 1.2	15.2 ± 1.1*	18.2 ± 5.8	22.7 ± 6.8*	8.3 ± 0.4	9.1 ± 0.5*
Subject 6	9.1 ± 0.9	12.6 ± 1.2*	19.3 ± 7.6	21.1 ± 9.1	9.2 ± 0.6	8.3 ± 0.5
Subject 7	13.5 ± 0.5	16.5 ± 0.5*	24.7 ± 2.8	28.7 ± 3.6*	9.1 ± 0.5	11.3 ± 0.8*
Subject 8	7.8 ± 0.5	9.3 ± 0.7*	9.1 ± 3.0	11.0 ± 3.2*	9.2 ± 0.2	8.5 ± 0.4
Total	10.9 ± 2.4	13.8 ± 2.4	19.7 ± 4.8	22.3 ± 5.3	9.1 ± 0.6	9.1 ± 1.1

* Represents p < 0.05.