Skip to main content
. 2015 May 30;16:33. doi: 10.1186/s12865-015-0099-7

Table 2.

Probabilities of significance of fixed effects on the expression of candidate housekeeping genes in bovine blood mononuclear cells under different in-vitro treatment. Significant probabilities (P ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold

Candidate gene symbol* 24s CTBP1 MDM4 PPIA RAD50
Source of variation
Mitogenic treatment (ConA)
Immunological Status# 0.2936 0.8759 0.5817 0.1220 0.9072
Culture time§ 0.2345 0.0041 0.0213 0.0002 <.0001
Immunological Status*Culture time 0.4287 0.4041 0.0036 0.5697 0.019
Antigenic treatment
  Complex antigen (C. albicans)
Immunological Status# 0.3501 0.6967 0.0032 0.1602 0.0524
Culture time§ 0.0420 0.0179 0.3493 0.0007 0.0009
Immunological Status *Culture time 0.4111 0.6621 0.0161 0.0148 0.8384
  Single polypeptide (HEWL)
Immunological Status# 0.0578 0.3333 0.0417 0.1948 0.0415
Culture time§ 0.0970 0.1510 0.9049 0.0055 0.6798
Immunological Status *Culture time 0.2852 0.2769 0.2026 0.8707 0.6076

*24s: Ribosomal protein S24; CTBP1: C-terminal binding protein 1; MDM4: mouse double minute 4 protein; PPIA: Peptidylprolyl isomerase A; RAD50: RAD50 homolog (S. cerevisiae). # General effect of immunological status includes naïve, immunized, and boosted groups. § General effect of culturing time included 4 and 24 hour time points. Bonferroni correction was not applied to this analysis since multiple comparison was not appropriate for all the fixed effect in this model