Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Imaging. 2015 Jun;40(5):1050–1059. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0384-1

Table 2.

Patient-level estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bowel inflammation (n = 24 with inflammation, n = 38 without)

Configuration Reader Sensitivitya
Specificitya
Estimate (%) 95% CI Estimate (%) 95% CI
Commercial IR (ASIR/SAFIRE) 1 88 (69, 96) 87 (73, 94)
2 79 (60, 91) 84 (70, 93)
3 79 (60, 91) 89 (76, 96)
Pooledb 82 (69, 95) 87 (80, 94)
ANLM 1 83 (64, 93) 76 (61, 87)
2 88 (69, 96) 87 (73, 94)
3 75 (55, 88) 89 (76, 96)
Pooledb 82 (70, 93) 84 (77, 91)
FBP 1 92 (74, 98) 87 (73, 94)
2 88 (69, 96) 84 (70, 93)
3 75 (55, 88) 87 (73, 94)
Pooledb 85 (73, 97) 86 (78, 94)
a

Sensitivity and specificity are based on 24 patients with at least one inflamed segment and 38 patients without, respectively

b

Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity have been adjusted for the correlation of readers within case through generalized estimating equations