Table 3.
Normative average | WFS | T1DM | HC | p | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | M | N | M | N | M | |||
WTAR scaled scorec | 100 | 14 | 104.1 ± 2.5 | 21 | 105.3 ± 2.0 | 18 | 109.2 ± 2.2 | 0.28 |
VIQc | 100 | 14 | 111.8 ± 3.5 | 25 | 108.2 ± 2.6 | 24 | 108.8 ± 2.7 | 0.70 |
Spatial relations scaled scorec | 100 | 17 | 107.1 ± 2.3 | 25 | 104.6 ± 1.9 | 25 | 110.7 ± 1.9 | 0.08 |
L-N sequencing scaled scorec | 10 | 14 | 11.1 ± 0.7 | 25 | 12.1 ± 0.6 | 24 | 10.2 ± 0.6 | 0.06 |
Digit span scaled scorec | 10 | 14 | 12.1 ± 0.9 | 25 | 10.9 ± 0.7 | 22 | 12.4 ± 0.7 | 0.27 |
CVLT short delay recall z-scorec | 0 | 14 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 23 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 24 | −0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.07 |
CVLT long delay recall z-scorec | 0 | 14 | 0.7 ± 0.2a,b | 23 | 0.0 ± 0.2 | 24 | −0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.02* |
CPT hit reaction t-scored | 50 | 13 | 39.2 ± 2.5 | 25 | 38.8 ± 1.8 | 25 | 42.8 ± 1.8 | 0.27 |
CPT detectability t-scored | 50 | 13 | 48.1 ± 2.7b | 25 | 56.3 ± 1.9 | 25 | 53.3 ± 1.9 | 0.05* |
UPSIT raw scoresc | 35+ | 19 | 23.6 ± 1.4a,b | 25 | 31.0 ± 1.2 | 24 | 30.1 ± 1.2 | <0.001* |
p values shown for the main effect of group in univariate GLM analyses for each measure after correcting for age and gender
*significant at p < 0.05
adifferent from HC group
bdifferent from T1DM group
chigher average = better performance
dlower average = better performance