Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2014 Sep 6;40:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.09.001

Table 4.

Standard score means and standard deviations for the four clusters on the pros, cons, and temptations for alcohol.

Most Protected
Ambivalent
Risk Denial
High Risk
N Mean S.D. N Mean S.D. N Mean S.D. N Mean S.D.
Subsample 1 492 223 70 10
Pros 44.17 2.31 62.25 9.40 50.55 8.19 59.82 12.48
Cons 52.67 6.35 52.06 5.94 26.38 8.80 38.34 13.17
Temptations 48.02 3.67 51.56 8.59 49.26 7.09 117.63 22.79
Subsample 2 351 248 186 10
Pros 43.66 0.94 60.03 9.56 47.80 7.65 64.79 19.82
Cons 56.26 1.29 51.95 5.47 35.80 9.90 45.98 10.03
Temptations 47.88 4.34 51.18 8.53 48.81 4.64 117.50 18.56
Subsample 3 335 173 278 9
Pros 43.82 1.68 63.91 8.60 48.12 6.31 70.74 21.25
Cons 56.28 1.23 53.11 5.94 40.70 10.92 43.90 7.99
Temptations 47.23 1.29 51.38 8.43 50.13 7.33 122.49 13.83
Subsample 4 415 205 159 15
Pros 45.25 3.22 62.83 9.30 44.39 2.62 65.74 17.82
Cons 56.05 1.71 48.20 8.29 37.00 10.92 45.14 12.43
Temptations 47.96 3.56 51.76 7.92 47.41 1.61 109.90 16.03
Subsample 5 498 208 69 19
Pros 44.61 2.50 62.77 7.13 44.76 3.00 70.39 19.55
Cons 53.95 4.18 48.97 8.76 26.81 9.30 42.04 11.98
Temptations 47.74 3.25 50.86 7.09 48.98 4.52 103.60 16.48