Table 7.
External validity analyses for alcohol at baseline. Tabled values are means (S.D.).
| Most Protected (N = 2196) |
Ambivalent (N = 1098) |
Risk Denial (N = 488) |
High Risk (N = 191) |
η 2 | Tukey HSD*
(harmonic means) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family support | 13.22 (5.49) | 11.87 (5.62) | 11.94 (6.16) | 10.69 (5.49) | 0.018 | MP > RD = AM > HR |
| Processes of change for alcohol prevention | ||||||
| Counter conditioning | 14.03 (2.11) | 13.29 (2.73) | 12.94 (3.52) | 11.06 (4.22) | 0.066 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Consciousness raising | 12.70 (2.87) | 11.98 (3.31) | 11.75 (3.73) | 9.80 (4.43) | 0.042 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Dramatic relief | 12.24 (3.20) | 11.49 (3.61) | 11.32 (3.99) | 9.12 (4.23) | 0.040 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Environmental reevaluation | 13.13 (2.80) | 12.32 (3.23) | 12.06 (3.76) | 9.86 (4.25) | 0.054 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Helping relationships | 13.29 (2.81) | 12.36 (3.47) | 12.19 (3.77) | 9.87 (4.31) | 0.058 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Refusal assertiveness | 14.06 (2.18) | 13.30 (2.81) | 13.00 (3.47) | 10.29 (4.48) | 0.088 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Reinforcement management | 12.58 (3.37) | 11.60 (3.89) | 11.84 (4.00) | 9.67 (4.66) | 0.035 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Stimulus control | 13.87 (2.38) | 13.02 (2.38) | 12.52 (3.74) | 10.30 (4.31) | 0.081 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Self-liberation | 13.82 (2.43) | 13.05 (3.05) | 12.88 (3.56) | 10.26 (4.33) | 0.070 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Social liberation | 13.90 (2.45) | 13.19 (2.94) | 12.85 (3.49) | 10.39 (4.26) | 0.075 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
| Self-reevaluation | 13.99 (2.28) | 13.27 (2.99) | 12.97 (3.57) | 10.55 (4.31) | 0.071 | MP > AM = RD > HR |
For all comparisons, overall F was significant, p < 0.001.
MP = Most Protected; AM = Ambivalent; RD = Risk Denial; HR = High Risk
*
Homogenous subsets using a harmonic mean sample size = 462.38.