Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dent. 2013 Oct 24;42(2):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002

Table 2.

Comparison of marginal fit of the groups IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max CAD and VITA PM9 between the three phases within each group; statistical significances (p< 0.05) are highlighted.

group phase _phase Estimate Local p-value Adjusted p-value
IPS e.max Press before cementation after cementation −17.35 < .0001 0.0018
IPS e.max Press before cementation after fatigue −13.08 < .0001 0.0018
IPS e.max Press after cementation after fatigue 4.27 0.0771 0.3084
IPS e.max CAD before cementation after cementation −3.96 0.0022 0.0220
IPS e.max CAD before cementation after fatigue −0.46 0.7997 0.9164
IPS e.max CAD after cementation after fatigue 3.51 0.0064 0.0512
VITA PM9 before cementation after cementation −13.25 < .0001 0.0018
VITA PM9 before cementation after fatigue −15.70 < .0001 0.0018
VITA PM9 after cementation after fatigue −2.45 0.1967 0.5901