Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dent. 2013 Oct 24;42(2):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002

Table 3.

Comparison of marginal fit of groups IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max CAD and VITA PM9 at the three phases; statistical significances (p< 0.05) are highlighted.

group _group phase Estimate Local p-values Adjusted p-values
IPS e.max Press IPS e.max CAD before cementation −4.47 0.0498 0.2988
IPS e.max Press VITA PM9 before cementation 10.78 < .0001 0.0018
IPS e.max CAD VITA PM9 before cementation 15.25 < .0001 0.0018
IPS e.max Press IPS e.max CAD after cementation 8.59 0.0027 0.0243
IPS e.max Press VITA PM9 after cementation 13.90 < .0001 0.0018
IPS e.max CAD VITA PM9 after cementation 5.32 < .0001 0.0018
IPS e.max Press IPS e.max CAD after fatigue 8.50 0.0188 0.1316
IPS e.max Press VITA PM9 after fatigue 7.15 0.0602 0.3010
IPS e.max CAD VITA PM9 after fatigue −1.35 0.4582 0.9164