Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dent. 2013 Oct 24;42(2):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002

Table 5.

Comparison of internal fit between the groups IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max CAD and VITA PM9; statistical significances (p< 0.05) are highlighted.

group _group Estimate Adjusted p-value Confidence Intervals
IPS e.max Press IPS e.max CAD −36.47 < .0001 −48.06 −24.88
IPS e.max Press VITA PM9 8.59 0.3676 −10.10 27.28
IPS e.max CAD VITA PM9 45.06 < .0001 27.60 62.52