Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2013 Dec 6;85(4):1727–1739. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12199

Table 3.

Mean Proportion Looking to the Target Picture on Trials, with Standard Errors in Parentheses, as a Function of Grammatical Proficiency

Proportion Looking to Target Increase in Proportion Looking to Target


Baseline Target


High Grammar
 Double Cue .50(.02) .61(.03) .11(.03)**
 Phonological Cue .53(.02) .60(.03) .06(.04)
 Distributional Cue .48(.02) .59(.04) .11(.05)*
 Overall .50(.01) .60(.02) .09(.02)

Low Grammar
 Double Cue .52(.02) .52(.03) −.001(.03)
 Phonological Cue .52(.02) .50(.04) −.03(.04)
 Distributional Cue .51(.02) .51(.05) .01(.06)
 Overall .52(.01) .51(.02) −.01 (.03)

Note: The mean proportion of trials on which infants were looking to the target picture across the Baseline and Late Target windows is shown on the left panel. Word-learning scores, or increases in looking to the target picture during the Target windows relative to Baseline, are shown on the right panel. One sample t tests comparing increase in proportion looking to target to chance (no difference): p≤.01 = **, p≤.05 = *.