Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 25;226(6):575–595. doi: 10.1111/joa.12303

Table 1.

Regression data for major cartilage dimensions vs. body size in tadpoles and frogs

Tadpoles α R N Frogs α R N P-value for tadpoles and frogs having the same α
LJ widthA vs. sbl 0.857 0.991 73 Bony LJ widthA vs. svl 0.861 0.989 32 0.8750 (N = 105)
CH length1 vs. sbl 0.825 0.992 73 CH length2 vs. svl 0.896 0.985 30 0.0106 (N = 103)
BA length vs. sbl 0.954 0.993 68 AP length vs. svl 1.006* 0.994 29
TP length vs. svl 1.143 0.973 29
P-value for regressions above having the same α < 0.0001 (N = 67) P-value for four regressions above having the same α < 0.0001 (N = 25)
Cart. LJ widthB vs. svl 0.820 0.992 31
Bony LJ depthA vs. svl 0.903 0.991 32
HGF length vs. svl 0.848 0.976 29

AP, alar process; BA, branchial arch cartilage; CH, ceratohyal cartilage; HGF, hyoglossal foramen; LJ, lower jaw; TP, thyroid process.

*

α not significantly different from 1 at P = 0.05.