Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 25;226(6):575–595. doi: 10.1111/joa.12303

Table 2.

Regression data for major vs. minor dimensions of element-enclosing rectangles in tadpoles and frogs

Tadpoles α R N Frogs α R N P-value for tadpoles and frogs having the same α
LJ depthA vs. widthA 1.089 0.983 87 Bony LJ depthA vs. widthA 1.013* 0.981 33 0.0713 (N = 120)
CH width1 vs. length1 0.985* 0.985 87 CH width2 vs. length2 0.464 0.771 31 0.0117 (N = 118)
BA width vs. length 0.947 0.993 82 Cartilage LJ depthB vs. widthB 0.619 0.938 31
P-value for regressions above having same α 0.0053 (N = 256) Bony LJ depthC vs. widthC 1.023* 0.955 8

BA, branchial arch cartilage; CH, ceratohyal cartilage; LJ, lower jaw.

*

α not significantly different from 1 at P = 0.05.