Table 3.

Regression data for other skeletal dimensions in tadpoles and frogs

Tadpoles	α	R	N	Frogs	α	R	N
LJ width1 vs. widthA	0.729	0.856	87	Cartilage LJ width5 vs. widthB	0.424	0.596	31
LJ width2 vs. widthA	0.772	0.925	87	Bony LJ width6 vs. widthA	0.916*	0.963	33
LJ width3 vs. widthA	0.880	0.972	87	Bony LJ width7 vs. widthA	0.662	0.639	8
LJ width4 vs. widthA	0.641	0.888	87	Bony LJ width8 vs. widthA	0.664	0.836	8
P-value for four regressions above having the same α		< 0.0001 (N = 87)		CH width2 vs. length2	0.464	0.771	31
				CH width3 vs. length2	0.497	0.770	31
				CH width4 vs. length2	0.845	0.904	31
				CH width5 vs. length2	0.433	0.699	31
				P-value for four regressions above having the same α		< 0.0001 (N = 31)
				AP width1 vs. length	0.900*	0.874	30
				AP width2 vs. length	0.950*	0.903	30
				AP width3 vs. length	1.262	0.974	30
				P-value for three regressions above having the same α		0.001 (N = 30)
				TP width vs. length	0.858	0.975	30
				HGF width vs. length	0.948*	0.611	30

AP, alar process; CH, ceratohyal cartilage; HGF, hyoglossal foramen; LJ, lower jaw; TP, thyroid process.

^*Not significantly different from 1 at P = 0.05.