Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 25;226(6):575–595. doi: 10.1111/joa.12303

Table 4.

Regression data for major cartilage dimensions vs. body size in male and female frogs

Regression Males Females P-value for males and females having the same α
α R N α R N
Bony LJ depthA vs. svl 0.951* 0.992 13 0.960* 0.995 11 0.8431 (N = 24)
CH length vs. svl 0.885* 0.967 12 0.936* 0.989 11 0.5667 (N = 23)
AP length vs. svl 0.946* 0.993 12 1.009* 0.997 12 0.1878 (N = 24)
TP length vs. svl 1.273 0.980 12 1.047* 0.997 12 0.0080 (N = 24)
HGF length vs. svl 0.934* 0.953 12 0.880 0.991 12 0.5631 (N = 24)

AP, alar process; CH, ceratohyal cartilage; HGF, hyoglossal foramen; LJ, lower jaw; TP, thyroid process.

*

α not significantly different from 1 at P = 0.05.