Table 5.

Regression data for cartilage widths vs. lengths in male and female frogs

Regression	Males			Females			P-value for males and females having the same α
	α	R	N	α	R	N
Bony LJ widthA vs. depthA	0.886	0.965	13	0.877	0.997	11	0.8946 (N = 24)
CH width2 vs. length2	0.352	0.557	12	0.578	0.931	11	0.2063 (N = 23)
CH width3 vs. length2	0.497	0.890	12	0.693	0.956	11	0.1016 (N = 23)
CH width4 vs. length2	0.976	0.917	12	0.987	0.973	11	0.9345 (N = 23)
CH width5 vs. length2	0.149	0.257	12	0.651	0.912	11	0.0190 (N = 23)
AP width1 vs. length	1.139	0.797	12	0.890	0.909	12	0.3925 (N = 24)
AP width2 vs. length	0.913	0.745	12	0.986	0.960	12	0.7674 (N = 24)
AP width3 vs. length	1.112	0.957	12	1.226	0.987	12	0.3702 (N = 24)
TP width vs. length	0.878	0.967	12	0.906	0.975	12	0.7903 (N = 24)
HGF width vs. length	0.671	0.490	12	1.052	0.667	12	0.5036 (N = 24)

AP, alar process; CH, ceratohyal cartilage; HGF, hyoglossal foramen; LJ, lower jaw; TP, thyroid process.