Skip to main content
. 2015 May 19;3:e967. doi: 10.7717/peerj.967

Table 2. Randomized phase differences in gain scores for Astym vs. EE, calculated using baseline score minus four week score.

Reported are the means and std deviations in parentheses, p values and effect sizes.

Comparison of gain scores Eccentric exercise group Astym treatment group Significance Effect size (95% confidence interval) Power
Primary outcome
Gain DASH (0 → 100) ↓7.8 ↓13.3 t = − 2.0 0.42 n = 90
(13.2) (12.9) p = 0.047 (0.00, 0.84) power:50%
Secondary measures
Gain Pain with activity (VAS)(in mm) ↓13 (28) ↓24 (27) t = − 1.8 0.40 n = 80
p = 0.08 (−0.05, 0.84) power:43%
Gain Maximum grip strength (lbs) ↓1.9 ↑9.4 t = 2.7 0.62 n = 79
(15.9) (18.5) p = 0.008 (0.16, 1.07) power:78%
Gain Function (VAS) (in mm) ↑12(28) ↑15(28) t = 0.6 0.14 n = 75
p = 0.55 (−0.31, 0.60) power: 9%

Notes.

DASH, a decrease (↓) means less disability.

Function, an increase means greater functional ability.