Skip to main content
. 2015 May 19;3:e972. doi: 10.7717/peerj.972

Table 2. The distribution and overall characteristics of biomedical open access journals between the Directory of Open Access Journals and the conventional biomedical databases.

In DOAJ Only in DOAJ In both DOAJ and conventional biomedical databases Only in conventional biomedical databases In conventional biomedical databases All open access journals
Number of biomedical OA journals 86.7 (2,804) 24.9 (807) 61.7 (1,997) 13.3 (432) 75.0 (2,429) 100 (3,236)
English language journals 88.7 (2,488) 76.5 (617) 93.7 (1,871) 92.6 (400) 93.5 (2,271) 89.2 (2,888)
Received impact factor 2012 20.6 (579) 0.1 (1) 28.9 (578) 12.3 (53) 26.0 (631) 19.5 (632)
Impact factor 2012 (median [interquartile range]) 1.316 [0.619–2.456] 0.372 [0.372-0.372] 1.320 [0.619–2.458] 0.994 [0.558–1.892] 1.263 [0.615–2.426] 1.257 [0.615–2.423]

Notes.

Values are presented as % (n), if nothing else is noted.

Percentages in the first row are based on total number of journals included.

Percentages in all other rows are based on the number in journals in each group (i.e., the (n) of each columns first row).

DOAJ
Directory of Open Access Journals
OA
open access

Conventional biomedical databases include: MEDLINE, PubMed Central, EMBASE, SCOPUS and U.S. National Library of Medicine.