Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 8;308(11):E978–E989. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00019.2015

Table A1.

O-PLS-DA model performance and validation statistics

Model Q2 RMSEP AUC Sensitivity Specificity
Training data 0.691 ± 0.05* 0.341 ± 0.06* 0.844 ± 0.09* 0.902 ± 0.08** 0.786 ± 0.17*
Test data 0.652 0.277 0.944 1 0.889

Q2, cross-validated fit to the training data; RMSEP, root mean squared error of prediction; AUC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve.

*

Performance worse than only 5% of all permuted models.

**

Performance worse than only 10% of all permuted models.