. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 2.

Published in final edited form as: J Comput Neurosci. 2010 Jun 17:10.1007/s10827-010-0252-5. doi: 10.1007/s10827-010-0252-5

Table 1.

ROI statistical comparison

(A) Mean and standard deviation

	EEG	MEG (awake)	NMSS
All	−1.33 ± 0.19	−1.24 ± 0.26	−1.06 ± 0.29
FR ROI	−1.36 ± 0.25	−0.97 ± 0.10	−0.76 ± 0.09
VX ROI	−1.21 ± 0.13	−1.36 ± 0.10	−1.14 ± 0.11
PT ROI	−1.36 ± 0.12	−1.30 ± 0.29	−1.16 ± 0.32

(B) Pearson correlation

	EEG vs. MEG	EEG vs. Corrected MEG (NMSS)
All	0.29	0.32
FR ROI	0.41	0.32
VX ROI	−0.17	−0.15
PT ROI	0.35	0.38

(C) Kendall rank corr

	EEG vs. MEG	EEG vs Corrected MEG (NMSS)
All	0.21	0.24
FR ROI	0.29	0.21
VX ROI	−0.03	−0.04
PT ROI	0.23	0.26

(D) KruskalWallis

	p value	Chi-square	df Error
All	< 10⁻¹⁵	1.53 10³	34,838
All noise-corrected	< 10⁻¹⁵	8.03 10³	34,838
FR ROI	< 10⁻¹⁵	3.30 10³	5,008
FR ROI noise-corrected	< 10⁻¹⁵	3.72 10³	5,008
VX ROI	< 10⁻¹⁵	1.72 10³	5,452
VX ROI noise-corrected	< 10⁻¹⁵	0.23 10³	5,452
PT ROI	< 10⁻¹⁵	0.21 10³	13,010
PT ROI noise-corrected	< 10⁻¹⁵	1.18 10³	13,010

(A)Mean and std of frequency scale exponent for all regions and individual ROI. (B) Numerical values of linear Pearson correlation. (C) Rank-based Kendall correlation. (D) Non-parametric test of analysis of variance (KruskalWallis). Corrected MEG refers to spectral subtraction using NMSS. The full table is provided in Supplementary information