Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Apr 18;114:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.04.007

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Learning and Memory in the Radial Arm Maze. (A). Across 5 days of acquisition (Acqu.) and 1 day memory probe (Pr.), presented is the average (± SEM) number of working memory errors (# WME) for wild type (WT), n=7, (dotted line) and knockout cGKII (KO), n=8 (solid line) animals. Days 1-5 of acquisition is presented after nine days of shaping. A memory probe of two trials was conducted seven days following the acquisition stage (Day 12). Working memory errors are re-entries into arms from which an animal has already collected bait. (B) Across 5 days of acquisition and 1 day memory probe, presented is the average (± SEM) number of reference memory errors (# RME) for WT (dotted line) and KO (solid line) animals. Days 1-5 of acquisition is presented after nine days of shaping. A memory probe of two trials was conducted seven days following the acquisition stage (Day 12). Reference memory errors are entries into arms from which an animal has never collected bait. (C). Across 5 days of acquisition and 1 day memory probe presented is the average (± SEM) number of baits found for WT (dotted line) and KO (solid line) animals. (D) Across 5 days of acquisition and 1 day memory probe, presented is the average (± SEM) number of seconds (s) it took for WT (dotted line) and KO (solid line) animals to collect all four baits. Four of the eight arms were selected at random to be baited for each animal and those same arms were baited each trial every day.