Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):782–785. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2955

TABLE 1.

Comparative Patient and Imaging Characteristics for Positive Findings Interpreted by the Same Radiologist or Different Radiologists

Total One Radiologist Two Radiologists

Characteristic No. % No. % No. %

Total 6,391 2,335 36.5 4,056 63.5
Age (y)
  40–44 908 14.2 295 12.6 613 15.1
  45–49 1,026 16.1 387 16.6 639 15.8
  50–54 1,033 16.2 379 16.2 654 16.1
  55–59 853 13.4 325 13.9 528 13.0
  60–64 728 11.4 277 11.9 451 11.1
  65–69 633 9.9 238 10.2 395 9.7
  70+ 1,210 18.9 434 18.6 776 19.1
Breast density
  Extremely dense 355 5.6 140 6.0 215 5.3
  Heterogeneously dense 2,474 38.7 889 38.1 1,585 39.1
  Scattered fibroglandular densities 3,002 47.0 1,101 47.2 1,901 46.9
  Almost entirely fat 183 2.9 73 3 110 2.7
  Missing information 377 5.9 132 5.7 245 6.0
Time since last mammograma
  No previous mammogram 854 13.4 311 13.9 543 13.4
  1–35 mo 4,197 65.7 1,535 68.7 2,662 65.5
  36 mo 909 14.2 329 14.7 580 14.3
Family history of breast cancer in first-degree relative
  Yes 719 11.3 258 11.1 461 11.4
  No 5,672 88.8 2,077 89.0 3,595 88.6
Self-reported breast problem
  Yes 265 4.2 99 4.2 166 4.1
  No 6,126 95.9 2,236 95.8 3,890 95.9
History of breast procedure
  Yes 1,802 28.2 640 27.4 1,162 28.7
  No 4,589 71.8 1,695 72.6 2,894 71.4
Workup included ultrasound
  Yes 2,496 39.1 907 38.8 1,589 39.2
  No 3,895 61.0 1,428 61.2 2,467 60.8
a

431 variables from the total had missing data.