Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013 Mar 5;186(3):255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2013.02.028

Table 2.

Effects of bolus injection of vehicle or test drugs on resting ventilatory parameters

Peak Response, %
Cumulative Response, %
Study Parameter Vehicle Drug Vehicle Drug
Naloxone Frequency, breaths/min +4 ± 4 +71 ± 19*, −2 ± 2 +36 ± 6*,
Tidal Volume, mls −9 ± 9 +1 ± 4 −2 ± 1 −15 ± 3*,
Minute Ventilation, mls/min +6 ± 8 +52 ± 11*, −4 ± 2 +15 ± 4*,
Naltrindole Frequency, breaths/min +52 ± 8* +77 ± 13* +7 ± 3 +39 ± 4*,
Tidal Volume, mls −16 ± 3* −15 ± 3* +3 ± 1 −8 ± 2*,
Minute Ventilation, mls/min +24 ± 3* +54 ± 7*, +9 ± 2* +20 ± 2*,
D-penicillamine Frequency, breaths/min +10 ± 6 +48 ± 6 +3 ± 4 +17 ± 4*,
Tidal Volume, mls +1 ± 3 +6 ± 4 +1 ± 3 +1 ± 4
Minute Ventilation, mls/min +6 ± 4 +43 ± 7*, +3 ± 2 +18 ± 5*,

The data are presented as mean ± SEM. There were six rats in each group.

*

P < 0.05, significant response.

P < 0.05, drug-treated versus vehicle-treated rats.