Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 2;10(6):e0128095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128095

Table 2. Results of mixed effects models: Change in affect from pre to post-assessment.

Variable Positive affect Negative affect
b (SE); [CI] b (CI); [CI]
Group a
Pseudo-exp. 0.17 (0.22);[-0.26, 0.59] -0.07 (0.24); [-0.54, 0.39]
Exp. 0.21 (0.22); [-0.23, 0.64] -0.02 (0.24); [-0.49, 0.45]
Time b 0.15 (0.16); [-0.16, 0.46] 0.19 (0.12); [-0.04, 0.43]
Group*Time
Pseudo-exp./post assessment -0.01 (0.21); [-0.43, 0.41] -0.41 (0.16); [-0.73, -0.09] c
Exp./post-assessment -0.11 (0.22); [-0.55, 0.33] -0.23 (0.17); [-0.56, 0.10]
Estimation (SE) Estimation (SE)
Random Effects
Intercept SD (Participant) 0.89 (0.06); [0.77, 1.03] 0.97 (0.07); [0.84, 1.12]
Slope SD (Time) 0.11 (0.01); [0.09, 0.13] 0.08 (0.01); [0.07, 0.10]

b = Regression coefficient; SE = Standard Error; SD = Standard Deviation; CI = Confidence Interval; Pseudo-exp. = Pseudo-experimental group; Exp. = Experimental group

a Reference category: Control group

b Reference category: Pre-assessment

c p = 0.012