Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 16;112(2):357–364. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.543

Table 2. Multivariate analysis using the stepwise Cox regression procedures.

 
Univariatea
Multivariateb
Variables P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Sex
Male vs female
0.9583
2.749
1.134–6.665
0.0252
Age
⩾60 vs <60
0.0391
5.649
1.992–16.12
0.0011
Location
U vs ML
0.0262
 

 
Histological type
Undifferentiated vs differentiated
0.8468
 

 
Tumor size (mm)
⩾40 vs <40
<0.0001
 

 
Venous invasion
Positive vs negative
<0.0001
5.681
2.173–14.92
0.0004
Lymphatic invasion
Positive vs negative
<0.0001
 

 
pT-stage
T3-4 vs T1-2
<0.0001
6.493
1.385–27.77
0.0177
pN-stage
N2-3 vs N0-1
<0.0001
17.54
4.672–66.66
<0.0001
SMYD2 expression
High vs low 0.0073 4.258 1.690–10.72 0.0021

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; ML=middle and lower; SMYD2=SET and MYND domain-containing protein 2; U=upper. Statistically significant values are in bold.

a

Kaplan–Meier method, and the statistical significance was determined by log-rank test.

b

Multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazard model.