Skip to main content
letter
. 2014 Nov 13;112(1):194–198. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.568

Table 2. Association between physical function and all-cause mortality.

    HR and 95% CI
 
Performance measures No. of participants Model 1a P-value Model 2b P-value Model 3c P-value
Short physical performance battery
Categorical              
 ⩽6 84 1.00   1.00   1.00  
 7–9 159 0.43 (0.29–0.65) <0.001 0.55 (0.40–0.76) <0.001 0.57 (0.37–0.89) 0.014
 10–12 170 0.29 (0.19–0.43)d <0.001 0.43 (0.30–0.61)d <0.001 0.50 (0.32–0.77)d 0.001
Continuous, per 1-unit increase 413 0.81 (0.77–0.86) <0.001 0.87 (0.83–0.92) <0.001 0.88 (0.82–0.94) <0.001
Fast walk speed
Categorical              
 <0.6 m s−1 153 1.00   1.00   1.00  
 ⩾0.6 m s−1 260 0.42 (0.31–0.59) <0.001 0.58 (0.44–0.76) <0.001 0.66 (0.47–0.93) 0.019
Continuous, per 0.1 m s−1 increase 413 0.82 (0.77–0.88) <0.001 0.87 (0.82–0.93) <0.001 0.88 (0.82–0.96) 0.003

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.

a

Model 1 is unadjusted.

b

Model 2 is adjusted for age and sex.

c

Model 3 is adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (continuous), type of cancer, time since cancer diagnosis (continuous), smoking status, healthy eating index, weekly drinking, hypertension, diabetes, asthma, arthritis, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, hospitalisation in the prior year, self-reported health status, weekly walking (ordinal), haemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein.

d

Test for linear trend of ordered categories: Ptrend<0.002.