Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 28;111(9):1831–1835. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.482

Table 2. Differences in follow-up measures by screening eligibility and information version (n and column %).

    Differences by screening eligibility
Differences by information version
  Whole sample (n=2272) Not yet eligible (n=1318) Screening eligible (n=954) Difference Version 1 (3 : 1 ratio) (n=758) Version 2 (total numbers) (n=736) Version 3 (per 200 women) (n=778) Difference
Breast screening intention (post-info)
Probably/definitely yes 2041 (90.2) 1169 (89.0) 872 (92.0) χ2(2)=28.8, 683 (90.5) 669 (91.4) 689 (88.9) χ2(4)=3.7,
Not sure 118 (5.2) 95 (7.2) 23 (2.4) P<0.0001 37 (4.9) 37 (5.1) 44 (5.7) P=0.45
Probably/definitely not 103 (4.6) 50 (3.8) 53 (5.6)   35 (4.6) 26 (3.6) 42 (5.4)  
Missing 10              
Change in intention (pre- to post-info)
No change/Increase in intention 2112 (93.4) 1207 (91.9) 905 (95.5) χ2(1)=11.6, 689 (91.3) 695 (94.9) 728 (93.9) χ2(2)=8.8,
Decrease in intention 150 (6.6) 107 (8.1) 43 (4.5) P=0.001 66 (8.7) 37 (5.1) 47 (6.1) P=0.01
Missing 10              
Objective understanding of overdiagnosisa
Correct 1283 (56.7) 784 (59.7) 499 (52.5) χ2(1)=11.8, 436 (57.8) 411 (55.9) 436 (56.3) χ2(2)=0.6,
Incorrect/don't know 981 (43.3) 529 (40.3) 452 (47.5) P=0.001 318 (42.2) 324 (44.1) 339 (43.7) P=0.73
Missing 8              
Subjective understanding of overdiagnosisb
Any uncertainty 802 (35.6) 497 (38.0) 305 (32.4) χ2(1)=7.5, 256 (34.3) 266 (36.2) 280 (36.3) χ2(2)=0.8,
No uncertainty 1449 (64.4) 812 (62.0) 637 (67.6) P=0.006 490 (65.7) 468 (63.8) 491 (63.7) P=0.66
Missing 21              

Significant group differences are shown in bold

Samples sizes vary slightly between analyses due to missing data.

a

Response to the question: who do you think is more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer? Women who have screening mammograms (correct) or women who do not have screening mammograms (incorrect).

b

Derived from three items assessing ease of understanding, confidence in having made sense of the information and knowing how to interpret the information; see Supplementary File 2 for wording and coding details.