Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 31;168(2):383–392. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00066

Table IV. Multiple regression analyses of εc in six major food crops.

The final model and ranking of variables included in the final model were determined using the lowest AICc. Variable coefficients and significance were determined using the final model.

Crop Variable Rank Modela AICc Coefficient (10−3) P
Peanut (n = 51) YOR, St, T −540.1 <0.001
1 T −536.0 0.426 <0.001
2 YOR −531.8 0.123 <0.05
3 St −526.6 −0.00238 0.12
Soybean (n = 117) YOR, [CO2], St, T −1,270.2 <0.0001
1 T −1,231.8 −1.04 <0.0001
2 St −1,226.3 −0.00824 <0.0001
3 [CO2] −1,204.3 0.0524 <0.05
4 YOR −1,201.3 0.0293 0.21
Rice (n = 102) St, T −1,133.8 <0.0001
1 St −1,125.0 −0.00960 <0.0001
2 T −1,014.3 −0.729 <0.01
Wheat (n = 159) YOR, St, T −1,451.2 <0.0001
1 T −1,447.9 −0.746 <0.001
2 YOR −1,438.4 0.105 <0.05
3 St −1,437.8 −0.00284 0.13
Sorghum (n = 23) 1 St −228.3 −0.00739 0.11
Maize (n = 149) YOR, T −1,347.8 <0.0001
1 YOR −1,346.0 0.346 <0.0001
2 T −1,344.0 0.521 <0.01
a

Independent variables included YOR, mean annual [CO2] during the measurement period, T, and available St. Water available as precipitation and irrigation was included when sample size changed by less than 10% after including it in the analyses. Density was included in maize analyses but was not in the selected model.