Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 17;111(6):1201–1212. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.396

Table 2. Sampling variation reduces the performance of an established lethal outcome-predictive biomarker signature.

Markers: PTEN, SMAD4, CCND1, SPP1 Mean AIC (2.5%, 97.5%) Median train AUC (2.5%, 97.5%) Median test AUC (2.5%, 97.5%)
H TMA lethal 282.2 (275.9, 293.2) 0.67 (0.64, 0.70) 0.65 (0.59, 0.74)
L TMA lethal 301.3 (288.6, 316.8) 0.6 (0.58, 0.63) 0.49 (0.42, 0.58)
H TMA aggressiveness 350.1 (330.4, 367.4) 0.62 (0.56, 0.68) 0.56 (0.44, 0.64)
L TMA aggressiveness 381.6 (353.0, 400.7) 0.61 (0.55, 0.68) 0.56 (0.46, 0.65)

Abbreviations: AIC=Akaike information criterion; ROC=receiver-operating characteristic curve; TMA=tissue microarray.

The combination PTEN+SMAD4+CCND1+SPP1 has previously been shown to be prognostic for lethal outcome when measured on prostatectomy tissue. We confirmed that these markers are indeed predictive of lethal outcome when measured in the high-Gleason biopsy simulation tissue (H TMA). However, these markers are unable to predict lethality in the low-Gleason simulation biopsy (L TMA). The markers do not show statistically significant predictive performance for aggressive disease regardless of whether they were measured in high- (H TMA) or low (L TMA)-Gleason tissue areas. C statistic, area under ROC curve.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure