Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 22;112(5):857–865. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.5

Table 4. Association between genotype and toxicity (n =127).

Toxicity and covariate OR 95% CI Multivariate Pa Univariate P
Binary logistic regression (low vs high)b
Neutropenia        
 UGT1A1*28 carriers 3.67 1.19—11.33 <0.05 <0.05
Multinomial logistic regression (no event vs low vs high)c
Neutropenia        
 ABCC2–24 C/T 0.22 0.06—0.85 <0.05 0.07
 ABCC2–24 T/T 0.84 0.63—1.23 0.85 0.08
Diarrhoea        
 CES1 rs2244613 0.29 0.09—0.89 <0.05 <0.05
Nausea/vomiting        
 ABCB1 3435 C/T 9.06 1.03—79.41 0.06 0.09
 ABCB1 3435 T/T 10.52 1.10—100.2 <0.05 0.05
Oral mucositis        
 CYP3A5*3 8.1 1.57—41.90 <0.05 <0.05
 SLCO1B1 388A/G 0.19 0.05—0.72 <0.05 <0.05
 SLCO1B1 388G/G 0.62 0.13—2.99 0.55 0.74

Abbreviations: OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for age at enrolment, sex, and treatment regimen.

b

Low=grades 0, 1, and 2; high grade=grade 3 and 4.

c

Results are shown for no event vs high regression where high was considered as grade 3/4 (neutropenia) and grade 2/3 (diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, and oral mucositis).