Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan 10;26(2):158–163. doi: 10.1111/jce.12587

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of patients with and without pre-potentials.

With PP
N=13
Without PP
N=8
P value
Age (years) 50.0±13.4 58.4±12.4 0.17
Sex (male, %) 6 (46.2) 5 (62.5) 0.66
Symptoms (n, %)
 Chest discomfort 5 (38.5) 4 (50) 0.67
 Fatigue 10 (76.9) 5 (62.5) 1.00
 Palpitations 9 (69.2) 5 (62.5) 1.00
 Lightheadedness/presyncope 6 (46.2) 6 (75) 0.37
 Syncope 0 (0) 2 (25) 0.13
Non-sustained VT 6 (46.2) 3 (37.5) 1.00
Sustained VT 0 (0) 1 (12.5) 0.38
PVC burden* (%) 26.1±10.9 14.9±10.1 0.03
LVEF (%) 54.8±9.7 48.1±17.1 0.27
LVEDD (mm) 53.2±4.7 53.6±5.8 0.84
LVEF <50% (n, %) 3 (37.5) 4 (30.8) 1.00
>1 VA morphology at AMC (n, %) 4 (30.8) 0 (0) 0.13
V-H interval during VA (ms) 32.1±38.6 76.3±11.1 0.06
VA ablated at other regions* (n, %) 1 (7.7) 4 (50) 0.047
VEGM-QRS at AMC* (ms) 9.0±28.5 33.1±8.8 0.03
Pacemap score* (n/12) 8.7±1.6 11.4±0.8 0.001

PP – prepotential; VT – ventricular tachycardia; PVC – premature ventricular complex; LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD – left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; VA – ventricular arrhythmia; AMC – aortomitral continuity; VEGM – ventricular electrogram