TABLE 2.
A. CHARACTERISTICS OF FEMALES WHO REPORT HAVING HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE: IBADAN AND SHANGHAI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
EVER HAD SEX (FEMALES) | ||||
IBADAN N=229 |
SHANGHAI N=216 |
|||
W% | UW n | W% | UW n | |
AGE | ||||
15–16 years | 8.5*** | 12/146 | 2.8*** | 4/65 |
17–19 years | 25.0 | 19/83 | 11.7 | 15/151 |
EDUCATION LEVEL | ||||
Less than 8th grade | 9.3 | 2/36 | 11.4 | 3/34 |
Some high school | 17.8 | 18/127 | 8.2 | 10/115 |
High school degree | 16.2 | 10/53 | 4.9 | 4/59 |
Some college, no degree | 20.3 | 1/13 | 11.2 | 2/8 |
CURRENTLY IN SCHOOL | ||||
No | 22.3 | 10/45 | 10.3* | 13/149 |
Yes | 15.0 | 21/184 | 5.2 | 6/67 |
RELATIVE WEALTH | ||||
Better than most | 14.1 | 12/114 | 2.3 | 1/10 |
Same as most | 17.6 | 15/91 | 8.0 | 12/183 |
Worse than most | 22.9 | 3/19 | 13.4 | 6/22 |
PERSON(S) RAISED BY$ | ||||
Two parents | 15.6 | 21/161 | 8.9 | 17/181 |
One parent | 31.4 | 4/19 | -- | -- |
Other | 9.7 | 3/37 | 7.5 | 2/26 |
UNSTABLE HOUSING | ||||
No | 16.4 | 23/179 | 5.2* | 13/194 |
Yes | 17.2 | 8/47 | 33.4 | 6/22 |
EVER DRANK ALCOHOL | ||||
No | 13.4* | 21/188 | 3.6 | 3/71 |
Yes | 30.6 | 10/41 | 10.8 | 16/145 |
ALCOHOL USE PAST 30 DAYS£ | ||||
Did not drink last month | 16.6*** | 3/19 | 4.3 | 2/50 |
< 5 drinks in a row last month | 44.1 | 6/16 | 7.5 | 6/57 |
≥ 5 drinks in a row last month | 77.0 | 1/2 | 25.9 | 8/37 |
PERCEIVED SAFETY IN ENVIRONMENT | ||||
Safe | 16.6 | 26/195 | 7.9 | 15/179 |
Unsafe | 17.7 | 15/30 | 10.9 | 4/35 |
Eversex – W mean (SE) | Ever sex – W mean (SE) | |||
Yes | No | Yes | No | |
PERCEIVED FEAR (scale)§ | 4.5 (1.29) | 4.9 (0.31) | 4.5 (0.04) | 2.9 (0.38) |
COMMUNITY VIOLENCE (scale)§ | 3.1 (0.35) | 3.2 (0.61) | 4.3 (0.39)* | 2.6 (0.18) |
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (scale)§ | 13.9 (0.63) | 15.1 (0.22) | 7.9 (1.07) | 9.5 (0.15) |
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF MALES WHO REPORT HAVING HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE: IBADAN, NEW DELHI, SHANGHAI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
EVER HAD SEX (MALES) | ||||
IBADAN N=220 |
SHANGHAI N=222 |
|||
W% | UW n | W% | UW n | |
AGE | ||||
15–16 years | 29.8** | 34/121 | 21.9 | 13/62 |
17–19 years | 53.2 | 52/99 | 28.9 | 65/160 |
EDUCATION LEVEL | ||||
Less than 8th grade | 72.1 | 11/17 | 45.0 | 28/61 |
Some high school | 40.2 | 43/118 | 15.4 | 28/103 |
High school degree | 38.8 | 27/72 | 21.8 | 19/51 |
Some college, no degree | 36.3 | 5/13 | 39.7 | 3/7 |
CURRENTLY IN SCHOOL | ||||
No | 51.3 | 18/39 | 33.0* | 68/164 |
Yes | 40.1 | 67/180 | 1.6 | 10/58 |
RELATIVE WEALTH | ||||
Better than most | 48.1** | 56/123 | 19.4 | 9/22 |
Same as most | 33.7 | 27/83 | 23.0 | 55/172 |
Worse than most | 19.4 | 1/9 | 48.5 | 14/27 |
PERSON(S) RAISED BY$ | ||||
Two parents | 34.9** | 52/159 | 20.3** | 57/182 |
One parent | 71.5 | 9/14 | 33.6 | 2/4 |
Other | 54.2 | 20/40 | 46.8 | 13/25 |
UNSTABLE HOUSING | ||||
No | 37.6* | 63/171 | 23.4* | 56/166 |
Yes | 47.0 | 23/48 | 34.6 | 22/56 |
EVER DRANK ALCOHOL | ||||
No | 33.8*** | 45/145 | 7.1** | 9/46 |
Yes | 58.7 | 41/75 | 31.9 | 69/179 |
ALCOHOL USE PAST 30 DAYS£ | ||||
Did not drink last month | 51.6 | 18/39 | 19.0 | 12/39 |
< 5 drinks in a row last month | 34.8 | 10/20 | 35.6 | 23/74 |
>5 drinks in a row last month | 86.4 | 13/16 | 37.8 | 34/64 |
PERCEIVED SAFETY IN COMMUNITY | ||||
Safe | 41.9 | 74/192 | 24.5 | 62/182 |
Unsafe | 45.8 | 12/27 | 30.9 | 16/40 |
Ever sex – W mean (SE) | Ever sex – W mean (SE) | |||
Yes | No | Yes | No | |
PERCEIVED FEAR (scale)§ | 4.3 (0.55) | 3.9 (0.43) | 5.0 (0.83) | 4.44 (0.19) |
COMMUNITY VIOLENCE (scale)§ | 4.0 (0.25) | 3.4 (0.51) | 5.3 (0.50) | 3.6 (0.12) |
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (scale)§ | 12.6 (0.48) | 13.5 (0.72) | 11.4 (1.08) | 9.7 (0.50) |
Displaying weighted (W) row proportions using cluster and combined RDS and age post-stratification weights, followed by unweighted (U) observations by variable.
p<0.001,
p<0.01,
p<0.05.
Comparing ever vs. never had sex by characteristics (row percent).
Note: 99.9% of females were unmarried at time of survey.
Displaying weighted (W) row proportions using cluster and combined RDS and age post-stratification weights, followed by unweighted (U) observations by variable. The varaible unstably housed was excluded for Delhi.
Note: all males were unmarried at time of survey.