Table 5.

Whole-body SAR, mean and derivation of the power flux density, whole-body dose rate (dose per 1min) and mean (with the corresponding percentage of the total whole-body far-field dose), minimum, median and maximum of the whole-body dose for the far-field exposure.

Band	Description	SAR((mW/kg)/(mW/m²))	Power Flux Density(mW/m²)		Dose Rate((mJ/kg)/(mW/m²)/min)	Dose(mJ/kg/day)
			Mean	Derivation		Mean (%)	Min	Median	Max
Radio 1	Radio broadcast transmitter	0.005	0.002	modelling	0.29	0.54 (2.7%)	0.00	0.22	11.30
TV	Television broadcast transmitter	0.005	0.001	modelling and personal measurements	0.27	0.47 (2.3%)	0.35	0.35	8.61
Downlink 900	Transmission from base station to mobile phone handset	0.004	−	−	0.26	−-	−	−	−
Downlink 1800	Transmission from base station to mobile phone handset	0.003	−	−	0.20	−	−	−	−
Downlink 2100	Transmission from base station to mobile phone handset	0.003	−	−	0.18	−	−	−	−
Downlink	Downlink 900+ Downlink 1800+ Downlink 2100	−	0.019	modelling and personal measurements	−	6.16 (30.4%)	2.46	3.47	86.19
WLAN	Wireless local area network	0.003	0.002	prediction regression model	0.17	0.48 (2.4%)	0.24	0.49	2.90
DECT	Digital enhanced cordless telecommunications	0.003	0.001	personal measurements	0.18	0.20 (1.0%)	0.20	0.20	0.20
Uplink 2	Transmission from mobile phone handset to base station	0.004	0.041	prediction regression model	0.21	12.38 (61.2%)	2.41	11.01	57.87

¹ Radio = radio FM (Frequency Modulation) + DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting); Radio was considered only at home and in school (geospatial propagation modelling) because used exposimeters did not measure radio broadcasting; ² Uplink = Uplink 900+ Uplink 1800+ Uplink 1900; For the far-field uplink exposure from other mobile phones the average of the SARs for the downlink bands downlink 900, downlink 1800 and downlink 2100 was used.