Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 11;2014(9):CD010678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub2

Summary of findings 3.

Summary of findings table 3

Artemether compared with artesunate for treating adults with severe malaria
Patient or population: Adults with severe malaria Settings: Malaria endemic countries Intervention: Intramuscular artemether Comparison: Intravenous or intramuscular artesunate
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of participants (trials) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Artesunate Artemether
Death 87 per 1000 156 per 1000 (95 to 258) RR 1.80 (1.09 to 2.97) 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,2,3,4
Coma resolution time Not pooled. No significant difference 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,3,5,6
Neurological sequelae at discharge 0 (0 trials)
Parasite clearance time Not pooled. No significant difference 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1,3,6,7
Fever clearance time Not pooled. No significant difference 494 (2 trials) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1,3,6,8
*The assumed risk is the median control group risk across studies. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 No serious risk of bias: Trials were generally well conducted and at low risk of bias. 2 No serious inconsistency: There is no statistical heterogeneity 3 No serious indirectness: The two trials were conducted in Vietnam and Thailand and both compared intramuscular artemether with intravenous artesunate in adults. 4 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: These trials, and the overall meta‐analysis are very underpowered to detect a difference in mortality or to prove equivalence. 5Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median coma resolution time for artemether vs. artesunate (Phu 2010 VNM: 72 vs. 60, P = 0.11; Vinh 1997 VNM: 47 (artemether) vs. 30 (artesunate IM) vs. 24 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials suggest an advantage with artesunate although not statistically significant. 6 Downgraded by 1 for serious imprecision: We could not pool these data as median data were presented for both trials. 7Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median parasite clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM: 72 vs. 72, P = 0.97; Vinh 1997 VNM: 30 (artemether) vs. 24 (artesunate IM) vs. 24 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials found no difference between treatments. 8Phu 2010 VNM and Vinh 1997 VNM reported median fever clearance time (Phu 2010 VNM: 108 vs. 108, P = 0.27; Vinh 1997 VNM: 48 (artemether) vs. 36 (artesunate IM) vs. 30 (artesunate IV). No serious inconsistency: Both trials found no statistically significant difference between artemether and artesunate.