Methods | Trial design: Double blind RCT Trial dates: Not stated |
|
Participants | Number of participants: 560 adults aged 15 to 79 years enrolled Inclusion criteria: Patients were included in the trial if they (or an accompanying relative) gave informed consent, had asexual forms of P. falciparum on a peripheral‐blood smear, were older than 14 years, were not in the first trimester of pregnancy, were not intravenous drug users, had received less than 3 g of quinine or two doses of artemisinin or a derivative in the previous 48 hours, and had one or more of the following: a score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of less than 11 (indicating cerebral malaria); anaemia (hematocrit, 20 percent), with a parasite count exceeding 100,000 parasites/mm3 on a peripheral‐blood smear; jaundice (serum bilirubin, 2.5 mg/dL (50 mmol per litre)), with a parasite count of more than 100,000 parasites/mm3 on a peripheral‐blood smear; renal impairment (urine output, 400 mL per 24 hours; and serum creatinine, 3 mg/dL (250 mmol/L)); hypoglycaemia (blood glucose, 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L)); hyperparasitaemia (10% parasitaemia); and systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg with cool extremities (indicating shock). Exclusion criteria: None stated |
|
Interventions | 1.Intramuscular artemether (Kunming Pharmaceutical)
2.Intramuscular quinine
|
|
Outcomes | Outcomes included in the review:
Outcomes not included in the review:
|
|
Notes | Location: Special Research Ward, Centre for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam Transmission: Not stated Funding: Wellcome Trust |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Trial authors provided no information on methods of sequence generation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "The drugs for each patient were placed in a coded sealed envelope and the envelopes were randomized in blocks of 20. Once a patient was enrolled in the study the envelope was opened". |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death | Low risk | "To maintain blinding, a separate team of nurses, who were not otherwise involved with the care of the study patients, drew up and gave the injections. The drugs were kept in an opaque packet in a locked cabinet during the study". Both interventions were administered by intramuscular injection so blinding was feasible." |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others | Low risk | "To maintain blinding, a separate team of nurses, who were not otherwise involved with the care of the study patients, drew up and gave the injections. The drugs were kept in an opaque packet in a locked cabinet during the study". Both interventions were administered by intramuscular injection so blinding was feasible." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses to follow‐up were recorded. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence of selective reporting. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other bias identified. |