Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 11;2014(9):CD010678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub2
Methods Trial design: RCT
Trial dates: May to December 1991
Participants Number of participants: 26 adults aged 15 to 45 years enrolled
Inclusion criteria: Patients with severe falciparum malaria (WHO definition) with no history of antimalarials within 24 hours prior to admission, aged between 15 to 45 years and weighed 45 to 60kg
Exclusion criteria: None stated
Interventions 1. Intramuscular artemether (Arthermin®)
  • Loading dose of 160 mg

  • Followed by 80 mg once daily for six days


2. Intravenous quinine
  • Loading dose of 20 mg/kg

  • Followed by 10 mg/kg eight hourly for seven days

  • Followed by quinine sulphate tablets as soon as oral medication was possible

Outcomes Outcomes included in the review:
  1. Death

  2. Coma resolution time

  3. Neurological sequelae

  4. Fever clearance time

  5. Parasite clearance time

  6. Adverse effects


Outcomes not included in the review:
  1. Survival rate

  2. Cause of death

Notes Location: Prapokklao Hospital, Chantaburi, Thailand
Transmission: Not stated
Funding: Support from United Medical Ltd., Bangkok (provided artemether)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "The patients were randomized to receive either quinine or artemether".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Trial authors provided no information on allocation concealment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Objective outcome: Death Low risk Trial authors provided no information on blinding.
However, lack of blinding is unlikely to bias an objective outcome like death.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Subjective outcomes: Others High risk Trial authors provided no information on blinding, however it may not be feasible due to different routes of administration for both interventions.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No losses to follow‐up reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified.