Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;2015(3):CD009579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009579.pub2

Hammam 2000_b.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Cross‐sectional design; multi‐stage stratified cluster sample
Patient characteristics and setting Species: S. haematobium
Country: Egypt
Sample size: 12,327
Age range: 0 to > 55years
Participants: residents from villages and households in Qena Governorate
Setting: field study
Praziquantel status before study: not reported
Index tests RS‐Microhaematuria, RS‐Proteinuria (Combur‐Test, Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany)
Target condition and reference standard(s) S. haematobium measured by urine microscopy (filtration method)
Flow and timing  
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? No    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test RS‐Microhaematuria
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
Was quality control done? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test RS‐Proteinuria
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
Was quality control done? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
Was quality control done? Unclear    
    Unclear Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
    Low