Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul;105(Suppl 3):S517–S525. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302668

TABLE 2—

Comparison of Access to Care Between Insurance-Based Discrimination and No Insurance-Based Discrimination: 2013 Minnesota Health Access Survey

Access to Care No Insurance-Based Discrimination, % (SE) Insurance-Based Discrimination, % (SE)
Lack of a usual source of care 18.0 (1.1) 34.5 (4.6)
Lack of confidence in getting care 4.2 (0.5) 21.6 (3.8)
Any care forgone because of cost 22.0 (1.1) 63.8 (4.5)
 Did not fill a prescription for medicine 8.3 (0.7) 34.6 (4.4)
 Did not get dental care 15.2 (1.0) 44.5 (4.6)
 Did not get routine medical care 7.9 (0.8) 32.6 (4.1)
 Did not get mental health care 3.9 (0.5) 20.5 (3.5)
 Did not get specialist care 4.5 (0.6) 22.8 (3.6)
Any provider level barriers 13.5 (0.9) 35.7 (4.4)
 Refusal of insurance coverage 2.2 (0.3) 13.1 (2.9)
 Not accepting new patients 3.1 (0.4) 15.7 (3.2)
 Unable to get doctor’s visit as soon as needed 10.9 (0.8) 27.5 (4.2)

Note. All Ps < .001. Data from the 2013 Minnesota Health Access Survey were restricted to adults aged 18–64 years who reported about their own experiences of insurance-based discrimination. Data were weighted to represent the state’s population. Standard errors were calculated using Taylor linearized series.