Skip to main content
. 2015 May;11(5):20141037. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.1037

Table 1.

Genetic variation of blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) in this study and previous studies.

microsatellites
mtDNA control region
no. samples, n no. loci mean no. alleles (±s.d.) mean allelic richness mean observed heterozygosity, HO (±s.d.) mean expected heterozygosity, HE (±s.d.) no. samples, n fragment size (bp) no. haplotypes haplotype diversity, h (±s.d.) nucleotide diversity, π (±s.d.) source
Australia (B. m. brevicauda) 109 20 6.00 (3.06) 6.00 0.602 (0.194) 0.600 (0.188) 89 414 14 0.680 (0.053) 0.003 (0.002) this study
47 10 6.70 (2.79) 0.659 (0.022) 0.655 (0.042) 67 394 14 0.683 (0.062) 0.003 (0.002) [4]a
25 10 5.80 (2.25) 0.590 (0.031) 0.625 (0.043) 32 394 9 0.758 (0.070) 0.004 (0.003) [4]a
Antarctica (B. m. intermedia) 142 20 11.65 (5.46) 11.31 0.758 (0.130) 0.763 (0.133) 140 414 46 0.968 (0.005) 0.014 (0.008) this study
183 410 52 0.968 (0.004) 0.014 (0.007) [6]
46 7 10.43 (2.70) 0.752 (0.145) 47 414 26 0.969 (0.010) [10]
Chile (B. m. brevicauda; putatively novel subspecies [14]) 52 7 7.71 (3.04) 0.692 (0.160) 0.730 (0.147) 46 360 12 0.890 (0.019) 0.011 (0.001) [7]
Mexico (B. m. musculus) 187 9 9.6 (2.4) 0.74 (0.03) 0.74 (0.09) [5]

aSeparate feeding grounds.