Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan 2;36(3):1001–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.012

Table 2.

Summary of reward-related behaviors altered by wheel running in rodents.

Species Sex Duration of access to wheel Effect on behavior Reference
Rat (Wistar) Female and male 22 weeks unrestricted access Food restriction increased wheel running, while increased access to food decreased wheel running Finger (1951)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male 10 min per day Rats lever-pressed for access to running wheels Kagan and Berkun (1954)
Rat (albino from Holtzman Research) Male Up to 14 days, unrestricted access Food was ignored upon presentation of wheel, resulting in self-starvation Routtenberg and Kuznesof (1967)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male Varied Rats lever-pressed for access to running wheels Collier and Hirsch (1971)
Rat (Long Evans) Male 2 h per day, 5 days/week for 8 weeks Increased brain catecholamine levels related to running, weight loss, and hyperphagia de Castro and Duncan (1985)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Female and male Varied Food deprivation increased lever pressing for access to a running wheel; acute wheel exposure during food deprivation decreased responding for food reward Pierce et al. (1986)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male Up to 70% of starting body-weight, or 20 days unrestricted access Activity-induced anorexia (and death) was reduced by propylene glycol but not ethanol Spigelman et al. (1991)
Rat (Long–Evans) Female Varied Rats lever-pressed for access to running wheels Iversen (1993)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male Alternating access Wheel access decreased oral amphetamine intake Kanarek et al. (1995)
Rat (Wistar) Male Varied Rats lever-pressed for access to running wheels; running behavior was dependent on duration of opportunity to run Belke (1997)
Rat (Lewis and Fischer) 30 days, unrestricted Access Addiction-prone rats exhibited higher levels of running compared to non-addiction-prone rats Werme et al. (1999)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male 2-h controlled access on alternating days, over ~2 weeks Wheel running induced conditioned place preference, which was reversible by the opioid antagonist naloxone Lett et al. (2001)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male 2-h controlled access on alternating days, over ~2 weeks Wheel running blocked the ability of morphine to produce conditioned place preference Lett et al. (2002)
Rat (Long Evans) Female 8 weeks unrestricted access Wheel running decreased breakpoint on a progressive ratio schedule for cocaine self-administration Cosgrove et al. (2002)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male 24 days, 2-h per day or unrestricted access Escalated running with unrestricted access Lattanzio and Eikelboom (2003)
Rat (Wistar) Male Varied Rats developed conditioned place preference to context associated with wheel Belke and Wagner (2005)
Rat (Sprague–Dawley) Male 25 days Wheel access suppressed sucrose and food intake Satvat and Eikelboom (2006)
Rat (Long Evans) Female 8 weeks unrestricted access Wheel running increased conditioned place preference to cocaine Smith et al. (2008)
Rat (Fischer 344) Male 2 and 6 weeks Increased conditioned place preference after 6 weeks of wheel running Greenwood et al. (2011)
Mice (BALB-c) Male 90 min Wheel running induced c-Fos in nucleus accumbens (core) Vargas-Perez et al. (2003)
Mice (C57BL/6J) Female Varied Wheel running increased in the absence of ethanol Ozburn et al. (2008)
Mice (BALB-c-type and D2L receptor-deficient) Male 30 min/day for 20 days Wheel running engages dopamine and opioid reward systems; motivational state affects ability of wheel to engage these systems Vargas-Perez et al. (2004), Vargas-Perez et al. (2008)
Syrian hamster Male Up to 35 days Amount of wheel running was positively correlated with self-administration of testosterone, which has reinforcing properties Wood (2002)