Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;801:637–645. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_80

Fig. 80.2.

Fig. 80.2

Electroretinography responses. a Scotopic ERG a- (lower lines) and b- (upper lines) waves were comparable between wild-type (WT) and rod-specific Elovl4 knockout (RcKO) mice. b Maximum a- (Rmp3) and b- (Vmax) wave responses were lower in the RcKO compared to WT but not to a level of statistical significance. c WT and RcKO had comparable cone responses (b-waves) to phot-opic single flash (2,000 cd.s/m2) and flicker (5–30 Hz) ERGs. p > 0.05 for all phot-opic ERG responses. n = 4–5 different WT and RcKO mice respectively for all ERG. Data is mean response amplitudes (μV) ± SEM