Table 6.
Relationships between the SURPS and approach reactivity
| Model | Estimate | SE | p-value | β |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| 1. Alcohol Approach | ||||
| Frequency of Use (per week) | .076 | .028 | .008 | .215 |
| SMAST | .184 | .043 | <.001 | .306 |
| I/H | .291 | .283 | .303 | .080 |
| AS | .212 | .244 | .386 | .057 |
| IMP | .338 | .269 | .208 | .087 |
| SS | .486 | .230 | .034 | .145 |
| 2. Cigarettes Approach | ||||
| Frequency of Usea | 1.083 | .061 | <.001 | .705 |
| I/H | .474 | .223 | .034 | .113 |
| AS | −.024 | .247 | .924 | −.005 |
| IMP | .452 | .229 | .049 | .100 |
| SS | .189 | .208 | .362 | .049 |
| 3. Marijuana Approach | ||||
| Frequency of Usea | .767 | .093 | <.001 | .590 |
| DAST | .032 | .021 | .131 | .098 |
| I/H | .142 | .202 | .482 | .036 |
| AS | −.194 | .234 | .407 | −.048 |
| IMP | −.061 | .274 | .825 | −.014 |
| SS | .617 | .200 | .002 | .170 |
| 4. Cocaine Approach | ||||
| Frequency of Usea | .460 | .084 | <.001 | .459 |
| DAST | .009 | .020 | .645 | .035 |
| I/H | .608 | .204 | .003 | .195 |
| AS | −.032 | .232 | .889 | −.010 |
| IMP | .648 | .220 | .003 | .194 |
| SS | .256 | .170 | .132 | .089 |
| 5. Benzodiazepine Approach | ||||
| Frequency of Usea | .609 | .098 | <.001 | .449 |
| DAST | .042 | .022 | .050 | .140 |
| I/H | .747 | .242 | .002 | .202 |
| AS | −.136 | .260 | .601 | −.036 |
| IMP | .519 | .243 | .033 | .131 |
| SS | .318 | .209 | .128 | .124 |
| 6. Opiate Approach | ||||
| Frequency of Usea | .622 | .092 | <.001 | .490 |
| DAST | .052 | .024 | .029 | .166 |
| I/H | .641 | .263 | .015 | .167 |
| AS | −.154 | .239 | .518 | −.039 |
| IMP | .371 | .262 | .157 | .091 |
| SS | .087 | .220 | .694 | .025 |
Number of occasions past 30 days
Note: Bolded text indicates significant results. I/H=Introversion/Hopelessness, AS=Anxiety Sensitivity, IMP=Implusivity, SS=Sensation-Seeking, SMAST=Short Michigan Alcohol Screening Test, DAST=Drug Abuse Screening Test, Estimate = unstandardized estimates; SE = standard errors; β = standardized estimates.