Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 27;74(2):511–531. doi: 10.1007/s00445-011-0545-1

Table 2.

Summary of parameters used in Eqs. 1 and 3 to find the deformed length

Transect Heading Relation to slope l x (m) \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \sum\limits_X {\frac{{{w_{\text{S}}}}}{\alpha }} (m) $$\end{document} \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {l_X} - \sum\limits_X {\frac{{{W_{\text{S}}}}}{\alpha }} (m) $$\end{document} e
α = 3 α = 12
Scenario 1: assume deposit expansion (l x = l t) l o l x = l t
A–C 322 Parallel 390 8.01 2.00 385 ± 3 0.013 ± 0.008
D–E 330 Parallel 230 4.04 1.01 227.5 ± 1.5 0.011 ± 0.007
F–G 240 Perpendicular 190 4.55 1.14 187 ± 2 0.015 ± 0.009
Scenario 2: assume deposit contraction (l x = l o) l t l x = l o
A–C 322 Parallel 390 8.01 2.00 385 ± 3 −0.013 ± 0.008
D–E 330 Parallel 230 4.04 1.01 227.5 ± 1.5 −0.011 ± 0.007
F–G 240 Perpendicular 190 4.55 1.14 187 ± 2 −0.015 ± 0.009