Table 3. Assessment of response to anti-parasitic treatment in the chronic phase.
Needs for Diagnosis | Medical conduct | Samples and Sampling | Infrastructure | Technical Skills | Test Site | Reading | Taxonomic Diagnosis | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assess antiparasitic therapeutic response (based on persistent negativization of parasitemia or reduced parasitic load evaluation though molecular biology methods) 1 | Direct or indirect demonstration of the presence of the parasite in blood or tissue: (i) Before, during, and after treatment (end point >12 months); ii) Therapeutic failure (through the presence of the parasite or parasitic DNA/ antigens in blood) | 2–3 samples (before and after treatment), Ideal: blood (maximum of 5 mL [adults] and 2 mL [children]); Ideal: urine | Reference center, PHC and second level of care. Ideally: no cold chain; Acceptable: minimum cold chain (2°C–8°C); Unacceptable: conservation < 0°C (freezer) | GLP-trained technical staff with-quality certification | Any health facility accessible and convenient for the patient; Maximum time for result: 1 week | Quantitative/qualitative | Ideal: taxonomic diagnosis (in the case of therapeutic failure); Acceptable: detects all circulating strains, but no taxonomic diagnosis | >95% | 100% |
1There is no consensus on the definition of cure, but experts agree that the persistent negativization of parasitemia is the most appropriate marker [23].