Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;9(6):e0003697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003697

Table 3. Assessment of response to anti-parasitic treatment in the chronic phase.

Needs for Diagnosis Medical conduct Samples and Sampling Infrastructure Technical Skills Test Site Reading Taxonomic Diagnosis Sensitivity Specificity
Assess antiparasitic therapeutic response (based on persistent negativization of parasitemia or reduced parasitic load evaluation though molecular biology methods) 1 Direct or indirect demonstration of the presence of the parasite in blood or tissue: (i) Before, during, and after treatment (end point >12 months); ii) Therapeutic failure (through the presence of the parasite or parasitic DNA/ antigens in blood) 2–3 samples (before and after treatment), Ideal: blood (maximum of 5 mL [adults] and 2 mL [children]); Ideal: urine Reference center, PHC and second level of care. Ideally: no cold chain; Acceptable: minimum cold chain (2°C–8°C); Unacceptable: conservation < 0°C (freezer) GLP-trained technical staff with-quality certification Any health facility accessible and convenient for the patient; Maximum time for result: 1 week Quantitative/qualitative Ideal: taxonomic diagnosis (in the case of therapeutic failure); Acceptable: detects all circulating strains, but no taxonomic diagnosis >95% 100%

1There is no consensus on the definition of cure, but experts agree that the persistent negativization of parasitemia is the most appropriate marker [23].