Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Photochem Photobiol B. 2015 May 2;148:284–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.04.025

Table 4.

Distribution of participants by quintiles of ambient temperature and quintiles of UVR, lagged by 20 years in the U.S. Radiologic Technologists study1

UVR Ambient Temperature, N (%)

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Total
Q1 8013 (62.1) 1625 (12.7) 718 (5.5) 989 (7.7) 1568 (12.1) 12913 (20.0)
Q2 4149 (32.1) 5156 (40.2) 1637 (12.6) 939 (7.3) 1032 (8.0) 12913 (20.0)
Q3 698 (5.4) 4998 (39.0) 4678 (36.0) 1151 (8.9) 1299 (10.1) 12824 (19.9)
Q4 26 (0.2) 1031 (8.0) 5418 (41.7) 4758 (36.9) 1768 (13.7) 13001 (20.1)
Q5 25 (0.2) 10 (0.2) 548 (4.2) 5074 (39.3) 7249 (56.1) 12915 (20.0)

Total 12911 (20.0) 12829 (19.9) 12999 (20.1) 12911 (20.0) 12916 (20.0) 64566 (100.0)
1

Temperature quintiles (Q1–Q5): 46.3–69.0; 69.0–71.2; 71.2–73.3; 73.3–76.6; 76.6–93.6 F° UVR quintiles (Q1–Q5): 75.8–175.6; 175.6–183.7; 183.7–196.2; 196.2–220.5; 220.5–312.2 J/m2;

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure