Table 3.
AUROC point estimates and p-value for a test of whether accelerated or unaccelerated TBM-SyN estimates provide better group-wise discrimination.
Groups compared | AUROC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Scan interval, months | Accelerated | Unaccelerated | P-value | |
CN vs EMCI | 0 – 3 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.63 |
0 – 6 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.65 | |
0 – 12 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.03 | |
| ||||
CN vs LMCI | 0 – 3 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.54 |
0 – 6 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.53 | |
0 – 12 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.76 | |
| ||||
CN vs AD | 0 – 3 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.52 |
0 – 6 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.96 | |
0 – 12 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.06 | |
| ||||
EMCI vs LMCI | 0 – 3 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.74 |
0 – 6 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.33 | |
0 – 12 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 | |
| ||||
EMCI vs AD | 0 – 3 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.56 |
0 – 6 | 0.78 | 0.8 | 0.49 | |
0 – 12 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.07 | |
| ||||
LMCI vs AD | 0 – 3 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
0 – 6 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.47 | |
0 – 12 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.12 |