Table 3.

Estimated Factor Scores over Time for Hazardous Drinking and Identity-attraction Discordance Based on Observed Sexual Orientation Dimensions, Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women 2000–2010 (n = 437).

	n	Hazardous Drinking		Identity-attraction Discordance		Wave 1 Hazardous Drinking		Wave 2 Hazardous Drinking		Wave 3 Hazardous Drinking		Wave 1 Identity-attraction Discordance		Wave 2 Identity-attraction Discordance		Wave 3 Identity-attraction Discordance
		M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD
Overall	437	−.02	1.68	.00	.05	−.02	1.81	−.26	2.13	−.49	1.63	−2.11	.58	−2.11	.57	−2.06	.71
Wave 1 sexual identity
Only heterosexual	0
Mostly heterosexual	0
Bisexual	11	.54	1.51	−.07	.05	.71	1.68	.50	1.99	.26	1.51	−.45	.60	−.02	.60	−.29	.54
Mostly homosexual	111	.17	1.61	−.02	.06	.22	1.71	.21	2.05	.22	1.62	−.20	.59	.09	.75	.06	.93
Only homosexual	287	−.13	1.70	.01	.04	−.13	1.84	−.11	2.16	−.09	1.64	.07	.53	−.04	.48	−.01	.61
Wave 1 sexual attraction
Only men	0
Mostly men	2	1.65	.30	−.13	.03	1.61	.50	1.96	1.04	.73	.80	1.23	.71	−.20	1.41	−.70	.71
Equally men and women	38	−.04	1.55	−.02	.06	−.05	1.66	−.08	1.89	.08	1.63	.81	.71	.03	.62	.18	.86
Mostly women	172	.00	1.60	.00	.06	.01	1.70	.07	2.04	.04	1.55	.24	.55	.11	.67	.11	.83
Only women	225	−.05	1.76	.00	.04	−.02	1.92	−.05	2.24	−.04	1.70	−.34	.26	−.09	.45	−.10	.55
Wave 2 sexual identity
Only heterosexual	2	−.64	1.44	−.13	.05	−.84	1.48	−1.73	1.95	−1.28	.80	−.27	.00	−1.20	.00	−.70	.71
Mostly heterosexual	6	.30	1.55	−.11	.02	.21	1.79	−.40	2.10	−.05	1.60	.40	.82	−1.37	.98	−.36	.69
Bisexual	21	.79	1.55	−.07	.05	.84	1.66	.66	2.02	.69	1.59	.40	.86	−.30	.62	−.01	.98
Mostly homosexual	81	.42	1.49	−.02	.05	.46	1.62	.43	1.91	.34	1.50	.03	.64	−.16	.47	.06	.86
Only homosexual	257	−.38	1.67	.02	.04	−.39	1.77	−.36	2.15	−.28	1.63	−.04	.53	.06	.49	−.01	.52
Wave 2 sexual attraction
Only men	0
Mostly men	9	.58	1.45	−.07	.09	.59	1.56	.61	2.18	.52	1.72	.07	.50	.69	1.69	−.33	.79
Equally men and women	28	.45	1.56	−.03	.08	.53	1.64	.51	1.98	.46	1.46	.48	.97	.37	.74	.07	.96
Mostly women	133	.14	1.72	.00	.05	.15	1.81	.24	2.18	.20	1.70	.06	.60	.22	.72	.14	.77
Only women	201	−.43	1.60	.01	.04	−.44	1.72	−.50	2.05	−.39	1.54	−.10	.48	−.23	.21	−.09	.51
Wave 3 sexual identity
Only heterosexual	6	−.04	1.37	−.13	.04	−.04	1.54	−.12	2.02	−.96	.88	.23	.55	−.05	.76	−.86	.82
Mostly heterosexual	7	.50	1.40	−.11	.03	.44	1.31	.58	2.11	−.16	1.60	−.27	.58	−.36	.90	−.77	1.13
Bisexual	43	.26	1.60	−.06	.04	.29	1.72	.28	1.96	.01	1.47	.17	.83	.03	.72	−.35	.71
Mostly homosexual	66	.22	1.80	−.03	.04	.23	1.92	.27	2.32	.13	1.83	.08	.57	−.05	.53	−.32	.51
Only homosexual	213	−.28	1.64	.02	.03	−.27	1.74	−.28	2.10	−.15	1.62	−.03	.55	.00	.49	.09	.51
Wave 3 sexual attraction
Only men	4	−.57	.97	−.02	.18	−.59	1.00	−.91	1.05	−.75	1.74	−.02	.50	−.22	.82	1.30	3.00
Mostly men	14	.12	1.55	−.05	.08	.05	1.63	.11	2.08	−.26	1.39	.23	.52	−.07	1.10	.30	1.10
Equally men and women	40	.47	1.27	−.03	.07	.58	1.39	.50	1.63	.43	1.31	.28	.93	.02	.62	.35	1.24
Mostly women	110	.03	1.78	.01	.05	.04	1.87	.12	2.25	.05	1.74	.11	.57	.12	.59	.25	.67
Only women	172	−.26	1.69	.01	.04	−.27	1.80	−.28	2.16	−.16	1.70	−.11	.50	−.08	.44	−.31	.44

Note: Sexual minority women (SMW) who were missing either of the two sexual orientation indicator variables at any given wave were excluded from structural equation modeling analyses (n = 10). SMW who reported a sexual identity as “other” (Wave 1, n = 2; Wave 2, n = 7; Wave 3, n = 6) or “transgender” (n = 4 at Wave 3 only) are not included in this table but retained in analyses. Bolded values highlight factor scores corresponding to sexual orientation dimensions observed at that same wave of data collection. Factor scores are centered at each respective wave. Higher (more positive) estimated identity-attraction discordance scores reflect sexual attraction that is more opposite sex–oriented than sexual identity, whereas lower (more negative) scores reflect sexual attraction that is more same sex–oriented than contemporaneous sexual identity.