Table 7.
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis
| Compared populations | Measure | AUROC (95 % CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| External criterion: mRS | External criterion: BI | ||
| Improved versus stable | EQ-5D-5L index | 0.57 (0.45–0.69) | 0.71 (0.59–0.83) |
| EQ-5D-3L index | 0.63 (0.52–0.75) | 0.79 (0.69–0.89) | |
| EQ VAS | 0.58 (0.46–0.69) | 0.62 (0.50–0.73) | |
| Deteriorated versus stable | EQ-5D-5L index | 0.70 (0.44–0.95) | 0.70 (0.41–1.00) |
| EQ-5D-3L index | 0.74 (0.45–1.00) | 0.75 (0.43–1.00) | |
| EQ VAS | 0.74 (0.45–1.00) | 0.63 (0.43–0.82) | |
| Improved versus deteriorated | EQ-5D-5L index | 0.75 (0.62–0.89) | 0.83 (0.72–0.94) |
| EQ-5D-3L index | 0.81 (0.69–0.93) | 0.91 (0.84–0.98) | |
| EQ VAS | 0.80 (0.69–0.92) | 0.75 (0.62–0.88) | |
AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, BI Barhel index, mRS modified Rankin scale