Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 9;22(3):671–681. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu041

Table 3.

Comparison of ADR classification precision (P), recall (R), and F-measure (F) of ADRMine with embedding cluster features (ADRMineWITH_CLUSTER) and the baselines systems on two different corpora: DS and Twitter

Method DS Twitter
P R F P R F
MetaMapADR_LEXICON 0.470 0.392 0.428 0.394 0.309 0.347
MetaMapSEMANTIC_TYPE 0.289 0.484 0.362 0.230 0.403 0.293
Lexicon-based 0.577 0.724 0.642 0.561 0.610 0.585
SVM 0.869 0.671 0.760 0.778 0.495 0.605
ADRMineWITHOUT_CLUSTER 0.874 0.723 0.791 0.788 0.549 0.647
ADRMineWITH_CLUSTER 0.860 0.784 0.821 0.765 0.682 0.721

The highest values in each column are highlighted in bold.