Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 9;22(3):671–681. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu041

Table 4.

The effectiveness of different CRF feature groups; all feature set (All) includes: context, lexicon, POS, negation, and embedding clusters (cluster)

CRF Features DS Twitter
P R F P R F
All 0.856 0.776 0.814 0.765 0.682 0.721
All – lexicon 0.852 0.781 0.815 0.765 0.646 0.701
All – POS 0.853 0.776 0.812 0.754 0.653 0.700
All – negation 0.854 0.769 0.810 0.752 0.646 0.695*
All – context 0.811 0.665 0.731* 0.624 0.498 0.554*
All – cluster 0.851 0.745 0.794* 0.788 0.549 0.647*
Context + cluster 0.860 0.784 0.821* 0.746 0.628 0.682*

Statistically significant changes (p < 0.05), when compared with All feature set, are marked with asterisks.

The highest values in each column are highlighted in bold.